Search This Blog

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Eagle Eye



Rated PG-13


Running time: 1 hr 58 mins


Cast:




**1/2 out of *****
(25% Fresh Rating!)



C+


Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

*** out of *****



The premise:

Jerry Shaw (Shia LaBeouf) returns home after the mysterious death of his successful twin brother. He and a single mother, Rachel Holloman (Michelle Monaghan), find out that they have been framed as terrorists, and they are threatened into becoming members of a cell tasked to assassinate a politician.


MY REVIEW


I love how we still live in movie world where people, namely critics, can put down a movie based soley off how implausible it is. Shut up already. Just stop going to movies all together then, it's a battle you will never win. Because guess what? People actually LOVE implausible movies. Especially big budget action flicks like this. Because your typical average movie goer doesn't over analyze things in movies that don't need to be analyzed. You know why an average movie goer goes to a movie, especially one like this? To be entertained! To enjoy themselves. To watch a lot of fast paced, really awesome action scenes with tons of explosions and gunfire! Oh gee, this movie seems to have all of that. So my advice to you critics out there who hated this movie, get your heads out of your self righteous butts, and learn how to enjoy a movie that was soley meant to entertain. Not every ACTION (!!!) movie you see has to be identical to real life you snobby critics! I could go on about how moronic some critics can be, but I don't have time for that, and this is about Eagle Eye. But this is why I don't dare call myself a "critic". I just review a movie, usually in a way normal people want to see a review. I just give my personal thoughts on the film without using big words (sorry critics, no one wants to read that crap) or throwing in my useless knowledge of films and actors (again, the average movie goer DOESN'T care how smart you are in movie terms!).

Eagle Eye is everything I expected it to be. Loud, fast, non-stop and fun. This movie was incredibly entertaining and even had some very tense moments. The story definitely takes a back seat to the explosivness, which is typically the case in a movie like this. This movie wasn't about incredible storytelling or smart dialogue. It was about taking an idea of the government using technology to monitor our lives, to the very very extreme. Could this movie have worked better with less action and more attention towards a good screenplay? Of course, and it probably would have been a much more sophisticated film. But this is what we got, and it wasn't all THAT bad. Like I said, the action was the primary focus here, and dang did it work!


Now I won't even go into the implausibilites of this movie. Because this entire movie, almost every single thing that happens, is UNBELIEVABLY impossible to occur in real life. But when you watch the previews, and assuming you are intelligent enough, you can see that. But that is what makes a movie fun sometimes. Why does every movie have to be plausible for people to enjoy it? Why does every movie have to be Oscar caliber for it to be good? This is why I love the fact that I watch every movie with new eyes. I give every movie a chance (even if I don't really want to see it), because you just never know. I'm rambling again. But yeah, this movie has rediculous car chase scenes, people shooting guns everywhere, a neat little chase scene in an airplane luggage conveyor belt thing, it has it all. It's just damn good fun!

Now here's my issue. While the action was tense and exciting, it did tend to be a little to much. Not the implausibilty of them, just the length of them. Some car chase scenes just kind of dragged on and after a while got a tad boring actually. Then the last act of the film had so much going on, just a little to much action even for a big budget action flick. The camera weeved around so fast during these scenes it actually hurt my eyes. The screen just became a temporary blur fest of colors. I think they could have dummed down the action a bit, and still had a great thriller.


Now the story itself, I really couldn't explain it to you. Which wasn't a major factor for me. I mean I was expecting the story to be weak, and I didn't really care. I think for me, I at least want to comprehend the screenplay. And I had a hard time doing that. Because just when explanations were being thrown around, it just got loud and explosive again. We barely get any breaks from the action enough to understand what the heck is actually going on with these characters. Again, for me not a big deal.

The performances were good, but what you would expect in this kind of movie. Shia LaBeouf (Holes, Transformers) is a very talented young actor, there is no denying that. He probably is the best young actor working today. It's hard to say "young' becuase I believe he's my age. But you know he has a very long future ahead of him. He can really carry any movie, and have big success off of it. He has to be the youngest box office king ever. Michelle Monaghan (Gone Baby, Gone) was a suprise here too. I thought her performance in Gone Baby, Gone was a fluke when I saw her in Made of Honor earlier in the year. But she came back, and really did well here. Never could see her in a movie like this, but I love when actors suprise me. Oscar winner Billy Bob Thornton (Sling Blade) was a nice addition to the cast. He's usually always pretty good, and this time is no different. Plus, he was funny!

Look, to sum it up, Eagle Eye is a fun escape from your personal lives. I just hope one day people can go to an action movie with open minds and turn off their critic brains for a movie. I mean really, just sit in your seat and have fun without analyzing a movie for once. Sheesh. But yeah, a lot of people will enjoy this movie. See it, I don't think most movie goers will be dissapointed. I really wasn't.

To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Eagle Eye

*This is the 121st new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

The Signal



Rated R

Running time: 1 hr 39 mins


Cast:








*** out of *****

(54% Fresh Rating!)




Has Not Viewed

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

**** out of *****


The premise:

A horror film told in three parts, from three perspectives, in which a mysterious transmission that turns people into killers invades every cell phone, radio, and television.



MY REVIEW

I may be being a tad over generous towards this film by giving it a full four star rating. But the fact of the matter is, to me, The Signal is an astonishingly suprising movie. I read the synopsis for the movie, before even seeing a preview for it, and I just judged it in a bad way. On paper, this movie sounds rediculous. But in reality, after watching it, this is one hell of an original and fresh horror movie. In a world FULL of zombie movies and zombie movies...and zombie movies, The Signal offers us something different. What if a we somehow intercepted a frequency that was sent through our televisions, and corrupted our minds through some form of subliminal message?

It's not even that far fetched of an idea really. Subliminal messages used to be a real thing. They have since been banned and made illegal, but it did happen. Now of course, it was never so extreme in this films case. But they flashed on TV screens and made people want to go out and buy Coca Cola, or some other product. The Signal takes that concept and glorifies it to a major extreme, and it works. By the end of this movie, we never find out where this signal comes from. We don't even know exactly what it is. What we know is what it does. It replaces your common thinking with those irrational thoughts that take place in your brain. It moves the bad thoughts higher up on the list. It makes us physically hallucinate false images of happiness. This signal makes us take our irrational thoughts and act on them in pursuit of what would make us and people we love, happy. Personally, I think that is a brilliant and different idea for a horror movie.

If you think about it, the movie is kind of a slap in the face. We as America are obsessed with television and music. Not to mention movies and magazines. Yet these outlets are constantly feeding us lies. We see these programs with attractive young people wearing the hip new clothes, so now we have to fit in to the mold to look cool. We will cut our hair to look like the hot young celebs of today. We throw out curse words a million times a minute because hey, people in music do it and that's cool right? Television and movies, and music constantly feed us lies for us to buy things and make ourselves someone we are not because we think that's what will make us happy. Because if these people on TV look that pretty and they are happy, why can't I? Maybe I'm overanalyzing the story of the movie, but it really isn't that far of a stretch from what I think they were getting at.

Sorry, back to the actual movie. Is this film gory? Yes, very much so. I do not recommend it for people who aren't big fans of the genre, or who just don't like gore and even vulgarity. But in all honesty, this is a very well made film. It is very sleek looking, especially for an independtly released horror movie. The film had three directors and writers. Each one wrote and directed a segment of the movie (The movie is told in three parts). And you can tell all of them collaborated so very well here. I mean this really is a fine piece of horror film. I'm so glad I saw it! Even the performances were really good! I mean I don't know any of these actors, but dang were they good in this movie. And I mean that on horror movie performance standards. If these guys were in Crash, no they wouldn't win Oscars, but for this genre, some of the best performances I've seen in a long time. A very long time!!




But if you have been searching for a new horror flick and are tired of that same old zombie garbage they've been chucking at us lately, the Signal is the movie you want to see. It is a darkly wonderful spin on a genre that has completely re-used itself over and over. Really original, really fresh, really really great. And I agree with the critics, this does have potential cult classic written all over it.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Signal


*This is the 120th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

*This film is now on DVD.

STRAIGHT-TO-DVD SPOTLIGHT: The Morgue



Rated R
Running time
: 1 hr 24 mins
DVD Release Date: September 2nd


Cast:







MY REVIEW

Funny thing about this straight to DVD flick, is that it has kind of a good story concept. The bad part about that is that it was a given a crappy budget and straight to DVD slap in the face. The other bad thing, is that this kind of story has been told a few times before in much better ways. The movie this film most resembles is the John Cusack thriller, Identity. The Morgue is about six strangers who find themselves trapped in a morgue over night with a psycotic killer on the loose. That's not the good story I was reffering to.


The last twenty or so mintutes features a "twist" that I won't lie, I didn't see coming. That doesn't mean it shocked me, it means that the first hour or so was so bland that when the twist came about it was just...eh. There was no real suspensful build up to the last act. First there was a story about a ex-employee who killed himself in the morgue and now haunts the ground killing people until he can be laid to rest. Turns out, that part of the story has NOTHING to do with the movie. Yes, a man who resembles this guy is stalking these people through the morgue, but you never really see his face. So we just believe it's this ghostly man. Whenever these living characters roam the halls and crazy guy comes about, theres no build up to it. Theres no tense music, he just is there. It's hard to explain without you actually seeing it.

They're just walking the hall and he just appears, casual as can be. And then when he attacks them, the filmakers neglected to insert a tense musical score. There was no music. Just close ups of these people having a scalpal waved in their face. Another thing, is that these characters are incredibly slow to react to anything. Something as simple as a question being asked, they take forever to answer. At the extreme end, if someone is being attacked, the other person just sits there and doesn't do anything for maybe two minutes. They don't scream, nothing. Then they run. Really bizzare. Just really slow people.

And then the big twist came, and like I said, it's a solid story idea. My problem with it, other than the lack of budget or big name actors, was that they felt they had to explain everything in detail. The last 8 or 9 minutes they litterally go back and show us what we missed. They explain the twist in every aspect. You don't really need to do that, it kills the effect of the twist when you carry it on to long. Yes, we have seen this type of twist a couple times before, but it's still fresh enough that you can occassionally shock audiences with it. If it the first part of the film is done right that is, and in this case, it's not done right at all.


I just want to point out real quick that Heather Donahue was in this film. Does anyone remember her? From a little film called The Blair Witch Project? It truly was bizzare seeing her outside of that world I've only ever known her for. Kinda feel bad for her. She stars in one of the biggest and most successful independent films ever made, and now she is in this mediocre at best garbage. Can't win them all I guess.


Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating: ** out of *****


To view this films trailer, click this link: Morgue


*This is the 119th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

*This film is now on DVD.

*Straight-to-DVD films do not qualify for my awards.

Friday, September 26, 2008

Miracle at St. Anna



Rated R


Running time: 2 hrs 40 mins


Cast:







**1/2 out of *****
(33% Fresh Rating!)



B-


Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:


**1/2 out of *****


The Premise:


Set in 1944 Italy, the story of four black American soldiers who get trapped in a Tuscan village during WWII.


MY REVIEW

Miracle at St. Anna does so many things right, but at the same time does a lot of things wrong. The movie starts off very promising. A man shoots another in cold blood, he's arrested and it's discovered he possessed a rare artifact that's been missing for 40 years. He's interrogated than we cut away to a flashback to his life as a WWII Buffalo Soldier. The remaining two hours and twenty minutes tends to be all over the place.

Like I said, the movie starts promising. It's kind of intense, and you expect some big, profound story to follow. But what actually follows is a major let down after a major let down. It kinda falls flat a few minutes into the flashback and never really picks up steam. I mean the story is touching in a way, and it obviously means well but the pieces just aren't put together that successfully. By the end, I personally was very dissapointed. I understand the end signified salvation and redemption, but that was such a lose point in the actual movie that you don't feel a strong emotional bond with the story by the end of it all. The movie kind of just let's go of it's grasp on you about half way through.

It does have it's share of powerful moments. I mean this is a WWII drama after all. One of the most powerful scenes, and one I could barely manage to watch, was the scene at St. Anna. I don't want to ruin it, but it's a moment that was tough for me to personally stomach. It was incredibly tragic and sad. I understand that was a common thing in the war, especially with those danged Nazis! Sometimes I think movie makers go a tad to far when trying to be real. I just have to think there is a better more civilized way to display such tramautic events.

Another issue was the very random and completely uneeded characters played by John Leguizamo, Joseph Gordon Levitt, and John Turturro. You have to see the movie really, but these actors and their characters almost quite litterally had NO point in the movie. Especially Joseph Gordon Levitt. I was happy to see him in the movie because he truly is a great young actor, but then dissapointed by the fact he served NO importance. It's hard to explain. The other performances, the important ones, were all excellent in their own regards.

The film looks incredible. It definitely had that going for it. It was wonderfully shot. The battle scenes were done very respectively. There was gore, but never too much to make you nauseous. It was almost classy in a sense. There was beautfiul locations used, incredible set designs. A great musical score. Everything that was technical about the movie was near perfection. It was just in the story the movie really faltered for me. It just never seemed to have that climatic moment, it never had that truly powerful and moving scene. With a story like this you come to expect that. The movie just never rose to the occasion.

To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Miracle at St. Anna

*This is the 118th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Doomsday



Rated R


Running time: 1 hr 53 mins


Cast:






**1/2 out of *****
(48% Fresh Rating!)



Has Not Viewed

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:


*1/2 out of *****


The premise
:


A futuristic action thriller where a team of people work to prevent a disaster threatening the future of the human race.


MY REVIEW



Oh boy. How much can I really say about a movie like this? Doomsday is yet another apocalyptic, end of the world, mumbo jumbo type of movie. It's been done over and over again. Nothing really is unique or different about this particular take on the genre. We have the cast of rebels who are tattooed up, have paint all over their face, and have dawned a mohawk. They all brandish very large guns, battle axes, the works. They use these weapons to fight off people trying to invade their territory. They do it in a very bloody and gory sort of way. It's not even entertaining really.

The story is lame, but I'm not going to judge the story in a movie like this. That would be dumb of me. You have to expect stupid plots in a movie like this, because these center more around the action. Now I won't lie, there were some very entertaining and somewhat tense action scenes. But most of them went on way to long, and were just way to gory for me to care much about them. And for me, that's ALL this movie had going for it.


Because if I were to mention the performances, I would have to say, "yuck". Well mainly it was David O'Hara (Wanted) who completely ruined the movie performance wise. I honestly had no clue what this man was saying the entire movie. He has this THICK Scottish accent, and all it sounds like is jumbled words. It sounded like he was eating while trying to act. Man he was atrocious. Rhona Mitra (TV's Boston Legal, The Life of David Gale) was actually kind of OK. But she had some Cheesy McGee dialogue. I liked her on Boston Legal a lot, to bad she didn't stick to that.

I mean, I recommend this movie to those fanatics out there who love this crap. Because you will go nuts over it, and love it. It's just, when you see a ton of movies in one year, from EVERY type of possible genre, a film like this is a joke. Sorry, that's just my opinion.
To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Doomsday

*This is the 117th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

*This film is now on DVD.