Search This Blog

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

The First Annual Worst of the Year Awards: 2008









The First Annual
Mikey At The Movies Awards
The Icky Side of Film Edition
















Worst “Dramatic” Motion Picture:












  • 21

  • My Blueberry Nights

  • Noise

  • Quid Pro Quo

  • Redbelt


Worst “Comedic” Motion Picture:












  • Definitely, Maybe

  • Mad Money

  • Meet the Spartans

  • Step Brothers

  • Witless Protection


Worst Other Genre Motion Picture:












  • 88 Minutes

  • 10,000 B.C.

  • Day the Earth Stood Still, The

  • One Missed Call

  • Passengers


Worst Direction:





  • 21



  • 88 Minutes





  • Passengers


  • Rambo

  • Witless Protection



Worst Screenplay:



  • 88 Minutes

  • Day the Earth Stood Still, The

  • Meet Dave

  • Quid Pro Quo

  • Witless Protection


Worst Film Making (Score, Cinematography, Art Direction, Etc.)












  • 88 Minutes

  • Meet the Spartans

  • Passengers

  • Quid Pro Quo

  • Witless Protection


Worst Actor in a Leading Role:












  • Faris, Sean for Never Back Down

  • Larry the Cable Guy for Witless Protection

  • Pacino, Al for 88 Minutes

  • Stallone, Sylvester for Rambo

  • Wahlberg, Mark for Happening, The


Worst Actress in a Leading Role:












  • Farmiga, Vera for Quid Pro Quo

  • Keaton, Diane for Mad Money

  • Mortimer, Emily for Redbelt

  • Snow, Brittany for Prom Night

  • Sossamon, Shannyn for One Missed Call


Worst Actor in a Supporting Role:












  • Gigandet, Cam for Never Back Down

  • O’Hara, David for Doomsday

  • Osmond, Donny for College Road Trip

  • Spacey, Kevin for 21

  • Wilson, Patrick for Passengers


Worst Actress in a Supporting Role:












  • Deschanel, Zooey for Happening, The

  • Heard, Amber for Never Back Down

  • Holmes, Katie for Mad Money

  • Sobieski, LeeLee for 88 Minutes

  • Witt, Alicia for 88 Minutes


Worst Casting for a Motion Picture:












  • 21

  • 88 Minutes

  • Happening, The

  • Never Back Down

  • Witless Protection


SPECIAL CATEGORY: Worst Straight-To-DVD Feature:












  • Asylum

  • Automaton Transfusion

  • Bone Eater, The

  • Insanitarium

  • Rest Stop: Don’t Look Back

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

The Bottom Fifteen Films of 2008!

The First Annual
Mikey At The Movies
Bottom Fifteen Films of the Year
2008 Edition


I’m not a professional film critic, so I don’t really have to follow the guidelines they set for themselves. Every year most critics release their “Top Ten” films of the year. I wanted to be a bit different, for no reason. So I decided to do a “Top Fifteen” films of the year! But also I’ve decided to “release” my “Bottom Fifteen” films of the year! Because there were a PLENTY! And here are my choices, in alphabetical order:





Ø 21




Ø 88 Minutes



Ø 10,000 B.C.




Ø The Day the Earth Stood Still


Ø Disaster Movie



Ø Mad Money


Ø Meet the Spartans


Ø Never Back Down


Ø One Missed Call


Ø Passengers


Ø Quid Pro Quo


Ø Rambo


Ø Redbelt


Ø Step Brothers


Ø Witless Protection





















Monday, December 29, 2008

The Wrestler

The Wrestler

Rated R

Running time: 1 hr 49 mins

Cast:

Mickey Rourke
Marisa Tomei
Evan Rachel Wood

Critical Consensus:

**** out of *****
(98%!!! Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

****1/2 out ******




The Premise:

A drama centered on retired professional wrestler Randy "The Ram" Robinson as he makes his way through the independent circuit, trying to get back in the game for one final showdown with his former rival.

MY REVIEW


I've never been into the wrestling craze. Before or after people realized it was all fake. I've seen a few films that center around wrestling. 'The Wrestler' is easily the best wrestling movie I've seen. It's actually quite a beautiful and stunning film with terrific performances.

The film follows "The Ram" a very popular wrestler from the 80's who's now living in present day doing gigs on the weekends and living a regular life on the weekdays. He works at a "Costco" type store, lives either in a trailer or sometimes out of his van. He's estranged from his daughter. His only connection to the outside world is a stripper named Cassidy. He's essentially a nobody at this point, and his life basically sucks. He misses the thrill of wrestling for huge crowds. Wrestling is his life, and when he tries to break free from that is when his life goes downhill. He made bad choices. He got into drugs and steroids. His heart begins to fail. He never sees his daughter. He tries to live this outside life, but he always goes back to wrestling. It's as if wrestling is his addiction.

This was a fantastically written story that shows the other side to these old time wrestlers. I loved how they showed us the wrestlers planning how each match would go. They showed us that these wrestlers who hated each other in the ring, were close friends on the outside of the ring. The film never once tries to make us think for a moment that wrestling was real. There's no buildups to any climatic wrestling matches. This story is about this man who's life got ruined because wrestling is his passion. It's a very sad story, almost depressing. This wrestler has broken down, and tries so hard to pick up all the pieces, but he just can't. His life sucks, and it will never be truly happy as long he's outside the ring. It was just a wonderfully written screenplay that showcased the fact that everyone's human. Everyone makes mistakes. Even these big tough guys who you think can never break down. It was so moving watching Randy "The Ram" try to live this life he's created for himself. Trying to reconcile with his daughter, but he just can't manage to do it. Even after all the begging, and the speeches this man is lost. The only thing he can win anymore is a staged fight in a wrestling ring. That's a bit haunting at times, if you ask me. The story does tend to drag on at times, and that's really my only downside. But otherwise, just a brilliant screenplay!

Mickey Rourke really has delivered a tour de force film performance here. He has proven you do not have to be flashy, you don't have to go all out to deliver a remarkable, sincere and unforgettable performance. He plays this deeply scarred character with such bottled up emotion and you can see that in his eyes. The times when he just lets lose and reveals his emotions are some of the most simple but most moving scenes in the film. This was a brilliant performance that could have been to much or over the top, but Rourke played it like an absolute champ. Also great was Oscar winner Marisa Tomei (My Cousin Vinny, In the Bedroom) who could very see herself with a third Oscar nomination with this performance. She plays a stripper, and this is the type of role that has been showcased in years past as being to flashy. A lot of the times these actresses who play strippers really go for a knock out "look at me, I'm a stripper, I'm at my lowest point" performance. But Tomei, like Rourke plays this role with such realism. She humanizes this character. You really feel for her. She never has a big, showy scene but her performance still managed to be quite superb and I applaud her.

The Wrestler is a remarkable and incredibly made film. When it gets wider release you should all go see. Even if you are not a fan of wrestling, this is still a film you should see. It's one of the most simple, realistic and down to earth films you will see this year. Full of characters you can feel something for. A story a lot of people can vaguely relate too. This was a brilliant film.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Wrestler

*This is the 179th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Saturday, December 27, 2008

The Tale of Despereaux

The Tale of Despereaux

Rated G

Running time: 1 hr 40 mins

Voice Cast:

Matthew Broderick
Dustin Hoffman
Emma Watson
Tracey Ullman
Kevin Kline

Critical Consensus:

**1/2 out of *****
(53% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

** out of *****


The Premise:

The tale of three unlikely heroes - a misfit mouse who prefers reading books to eating them, an unhappy rat who schemes to leave the darkness of the dungeon, and a bumbling servant girl with cauliflower ears - whose fates are intertwined with that of the castle's princess.

MY REVIEW


'The Tale of Despereaux' tells quite a boring tale if you ask me. I had a very hard time staying focused on the movie. I think for an animated childrens film, 'Despereaux' may have suffered most from an overly "complicated" story. No I don't mean it was difficult to understand, just that it was too busy and I think ultimately would just distract kids. These types of movies should have fairly simple stories with simple dialogue. Or at least lovable characters. This one really didn't have enough of any of those things. It did however have some great animation, I will definitely give it that much praise. But other than that, there is too much more to say. 'Despereaux' is simply to boring and has to much going on. It wasn't all that fun.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Despereaux

*This is the 178th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Doubt

Doubt

Rated PG-13

Running time: 1 hr 44 mins

Cast:

Meryl Streep
Phillip Seymour Hoffman
Amy Adams
Viola Davis

Critical Consensus:

***1/2 out of *****
(73% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

***** out of *****




The Premise:

Set in 1964, Doubt centers on a nun who confronts a priest after suspecting him abusing a black student. He denies the charges, and much of the play's quick-fire dialogue tackles themes of religion, morality and authority.

MY REVIEW

In the film 'Doubt' the word doubt is probably said 10-15 times. Some would think that would be a over use of the film's title. But the title is appropriately named, seeing as how the film centers around characters who truly aren't certain about any of their finger pointing. Even the stern Sister Aloysious who's accusing Father Flynn of some serious wrong doing towards an alter boy shows moments of uncertainty in her actions. But one minuscule moments. The movie, if you don't know, is about a head nun/principal at a Catholic school who adamantly tries to get the new priest to confess he "made wrongful advances" on a young black alter boy. He denies it with every ounce of his power. She seems one hundred percent sure he did something very bad. In the middle of this is Sister James who originally told the principal she suspected some wrong doing. However she ends up caught in the middle, and attempts to be the voice of reason. Of a main cast of 3 or 4, Sister James really is the only good person with truly good, God like intentions.

Doubt is one of very best films of 2008, there is simply no question about that. This is a movie I had been looking forward to since the day I saw the preview and I have recently been afraid I would be dissapointed by the outcome. I had been hyping myself up with all the award talk surrounding the film. I am very happy to say that 'Doubt' was just as amazing as I originally expected it to be. The film is based off a play that has won a few Tony Awards. The movie comes to screen with the same feel of a stage play. Some critics were bothered by that, but I thought it worked perfectly. The literal setting never really left the Church. So we weren't bothered by too many sets (which were perfect in the film). It also made the setting very simplistic, and the story never wandered to far out of it's reach where the audience would get distracted. This film stuck to it's story, and we were offered nothing else. No major backgrounds of any of the characters and no elaborate set-up. The story kicked off almost immediately and never once let go of you. This made for an incredibly tense story. It was a great story.

The entire time you honestly have no idea who's side you are on, at least I didn't. The two main characters are both right in their own ways, and also both wrong. Both of them are also not all that lovable. You really don't feel for any of them so it's difficult to take a side when you don't have proof from any of them for their cases. Which makes the title even more perfect, because I too felt this level of uncertainty the entire running of the film. That to me makes for a very suspenseful character drama. A lot of people may wonder how on Earth a drama about a Catholic nun and priest could have any remote levels of excitement. Well then see 'Doubt' and you will know exactly how that could be. Do you ever find out the truth? I'm not going to tell you, but the movie in my opinion concluded absolutely perfectly for the message it was ultimately trying to give to us.

The man who created the play, also brought this film to screen life. He did such a fantastic job with this task. Like I said above, it all looks very simplistic and nothing no set or costume is to elaborate. I don't think it will win any costuming or set design awards, but the movie wasn't supposed to be flashy. Why get distracted by over the top visuals, when the story never calls for it even though it takes place in the 60's. It would be silly. But really this had perfect craftsmanship nonetheless. The camera focused on these characters and their verbal battles which really just got you into what we were watching unfold. Oh and also, an excellent score by Oscar winning composer Howard Shore (Lord of the Rings)!

This may be one of the smallest ensemble casts of the year, but it may very well be one of the best. Oscar winner Meryl Streep (Sophie's Choice, Kramer Vs. Kramer) was brilliant! This may actually be one of my favorite Streep performances. Her performance here was incredibly powerful and terrifying. Her character was down-right nasty and scary, and she did a phenomenal job playing a cold hearted you know what! She deserves to WIN an Oscar for this turn! Oscar winner Phillip Seymour Hoffman (Capote, Charlie Wilson's War) was not to shabby himself. Actually he was incredible and worked perfectly with Streep. He plays his character so creepily, and you never really feel bad for him. When he goes toe to toe with Streep in verbal wars, he is simply amazing and makes you feel so tense! He was excellent!

Oscar nominee Amy Adams (Junebug, Enchanted) was the only character you felt true compassion for. You know what, she may not have been as fierce as the two main characters, but that didn't stop her from delivering one of her best performances to date. She had to play that voice of reason, and in a way she was the character the audience relates to, because we are in the same boat as her. She had her moments of snapping though, and she really shined in this film. I of course have to talk about Viola Davis (Disturbia, Nights in Rodanthe), seeing as how she is garnering a ton of awards and attention for her role in this film. She has but one scene in the entire film, and really she's just a cameo. But her scene may very well be one of the most memorable in the film. She really takes the film and flips it in her one ten minute scene. I won't say what goes down, but her emotional talk with Streep does not go down how you expect it to. You want her to be the victim and the voice of reason, but it's really not what you get. It's actually quite shocking where she takes the film. Her performance for me was incredibly moving and one of the best parts of a brilliant film. For the first time, an actress who went head to head with Meryl Streep out-shined the Oscar winner! She owned that scene, no question. While all the other characters scream at each other, Viola Davis uses a more calmed anger to voice her place in all this. Superbly acted scene in an incredibly well acted film.

This review has gone on a long time, I'm sorry about that. But in time full of colorful and flashy movies garnering all these awards, it's actually quite refreshing to have a film like 'Doubt'. You would think a movie like this, with a cast like this would just be screaming for Oscar, but I never once thought it was just going for awards. I really think this film was made to simply be a great film, and that's exactly what it was.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Doubt

*This is the 177th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Friday, December 26, 2008

Four Christmases

Four Christmases

Rated PG-13

Running time: 1 hr 21 mins

Cast:

Vince Vaughn
Reese Witherspoon
Robert DuVall
Sissy Spacek
Jon Voight
Mary Steenburgen

Critical Consensus:

** out of *****
(25% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

*** out of *****




The Premise:

A couple struggle to visit all four of their divorced parents on Christmas Day.

MY REVIEW


Pleasant surprise alert! Here I was expecting 'Four Christmases' to be just another random and stupid family Christmas film that we see a ton of every holiday season. Well OK it was a family holiday film and it was a bit on the random side. But you know what? It was not stupid. This movie was actually quite hilarious! You know what else? I kinda quite took a liking to this movie. Yes, I will forget about it in maybe a week or two, and it won't be a nominee for my best comedy award. But this movie provided some good, near clean fun that I think families can enjoy.

The movie really nailed dysfunctional families. Obviously they threw in a comedic twist, but the family situation in the film were almost like reality. There were so many awkward moments for the two main characters, but they also made me feel uncomfortable like I was in the rooms with them. I felt bad for all the characters! Babies screaming, dads yelling, crazy moms, off the wall siblings, bizarre step-parents, the works. It's kind of silly to admit, but this movie was somewhat realistic. Now, my family is not like this, but there are families out there that are very similar to what's featured in the film.

The story was probably the weakest part of the film. It follows a long term relationship couple played by Oscar winner Reese Witherspoon (Walk the Line, Legally Blonde) and funny man Vince Vaughn (Old School, Wedding Crashers) being forced to visit their divorced parents when they should have been going to Tahiti for Christmas. This couple seems perfect and loving, and we have no reason to believe other wise. Through their family gatherings, they each learn a new thing or two about each other. Some of the stuff is upsetting to them, but nothing really traumatic. Then about 16 or 17 minutes before the film ends, the big fight happens and all these pent up issues arise in a car ride. I was like, "Whoa! To much, to late". The big dilemma of the film happens way to far into the movie, and it get's resolved way to fast. The last 20 minutes felt like one of those half hour sitcoms where a problem happens but then it's solved by the end of the episode. This wasn't really all that bad for the film, but they just tried to incorporate to much sappiness into an otherwise lighthearted family comedy.

This movie was darn funny! I laughed quite a bit! I've never really appreciated Vince Vaughn as a comedic actor. Usually he's in films where his dialog is a bit risque for me, and is just littered with sex crap. Usually I said, not all the time, don't yell at me. To see him here, and act in his Vince Vaughn persona but with clean dialog was just great! He really was the funniest part of the film! The rest of the case was great comedically too. Most of them were mere extended cameos, which was nice. We didn't have to deal with a large cast together with to much screen time.

Hey if you are bored during the holidays and want to go see a fun movie, don't waste your cash on Yes Man I would suggest 'Four Christmases', it's a much better, less forced comedy!


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Four Christmases

*This is the 176th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Rated PG-13

Running time: 2 hrs 47 mins

Cast:

Brad Pitt
Cate Blanchett
Taraji P. Henson
Tilda Swinton

Critical Consensus:

***1/2 out of *****
(76% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

****1/2 out of *****




The Premise:

Tells the story of Benjamin Button, a man who starts aging backwards with bizarre consequences.

MY REVIEW


Benjamin Button is a beautiful, epic and absolutely wonderful film clocking in at just under three hours. A film like this needs to be three hours because there is a ton of story to tell and a whole lifetime to show us. This movie is easily one of the most original and also touching concepts of a love story that I've ever seen. The story really proves the point that true love CAN stand the test of time and that beauty isn't just skin deep. Button could have been a creepy story with it at times being about an "older" looking man having the hots for a seven or eight year old. But really the story was told much more delicately than that.

Button really is a unique film. It tells the story of Benjamin Button, who was born an old man in a babies body. He grows like a child does, but ages backwards. So he's about in his mid-eighties when he is born. We seem him grow, have love for his adopted mother, and explore the world. He then meets Daisy, a girl about his age (technically) and a spark grows between the two. The rest of the film follows both characters in their different lives which eventually have them meeting in the middle (age wise) and falling in love. There really is a ton of story in this film, so I won't go on to much about it, but you get the idea now. In terms of the screenplay, it is amazing One of the best storylines of the year. Beautiful dialog and unique characters. A truly original tale of love.

The problem I had with the movie was there was no real emotional depth to the film. It's a near three hour movie, and never once did I feel any connection or sorrow for any of the characters in the film. Not to say they were all one-dimensional, but they weren't fully three dimensional either. Somewhere in the middle. So that when tragedy strikes their lives, I didn't feel bad. I didn't get teary eyed. There's even a part in the film where a central character passes away (of course there's death, this movie takes place over 90 years) but it happens so abruptly and we never had a hint that they were dying. It was one of my favorite characters in the film, but when they died it was like.."Oh...OK" and I didn't feel the heartache of the characters. And other people passed away but not once did I feel ANY emotions over it. The ending of the film did seem a tad rushed, but not to much that I didn't like it. Although there was a storyline that didn't seem to get resolved between a mother and daughter but I won't go into to much detail.

That may sound like enough to ruin the movie, but it did not. I still think this was an incredible movie. First off, it looked stunning. One of the best looking films of the year. I get so excited to see these epic films that span a lifetime because you get to see an array or wondrous set designs and costumes that really add to the feel of a movie like this. And boy oh boy were there some great visuals. Absolutely lavish sets that really brought you back in time. And the film had an amazing musical score that you would expect a film like this to have. Well I was not dissapointed by that aspect. The music captured the essence of the movie, so it was pitch perfect! The aging of Benjamin Button was done masterfully and every new Benjamin we got to see (the oldest and some of the youngest) looked just like Brad Pitt. I don't know exactly how they did this, but it was awesome. The older one was maybe three feet tall, but still had that Pitt face. Freaking movie magic, got to love it right?

A movie like this would not be complete without some brilliant performances, and I felt like it did have some of those. Oscar nominee Brad Pitt has amazed me this year with film's like this and Burn After Reading. I never knew he could be this good. He carries this film all the way to the finish line. He narrates the movie excellently, and when he's on screen you don't really see the Brad Pitt we've all grown to know so well. I feel he immersed himself in this character, and it payed off super well for him. I believe he deserves an Oscar nomination this year (two if you include Burn After Reading). Oscar winner Cate Blanchett (The Aviator, I'm Not There) was in almost the entire film if you think about it. She did play the old woman version too you know. Personally I thought she was brilliant and stunning. I think she deserves her sixth Oscar nomination for this film! Maybe it was that New Orleans accent, I don't know, but she was amazing! She looked beautiful as well, even as she grew a little older. You know who else I loved in this movie, and also deserves some award attention, Taraji P. Wilson (Talk to Me, TV's Boston Legal). She played Benjamin's mother Queenie was such an incredible sweetness and she was so lovable. It was kind of a simple performance, but at the same time she was so great!

Benjamin Button is a must see film in my opinion, even though it is very long. But really for me it didn't feel three hours in length. This movie, which only falters in grabbing an audience emotionally (at least me it didn't), really is a near masterpiece in film making. One of the best movies of the year, and I think it will prove that come Oscar time. Go see Benjamin Button! Great movie!

To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Benjamin Button

*This is the 175th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Seven Pounds

Seven Pounds

Rated PG-13

Running time: 1 hr 58 mins

Cast:

Will Smith
Rosario Dawson
Woody Harrelson
Barry Pepper

Critical Consensus:

** out of *****
(28% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

*1/2 out of *****



The Premise:

An IRS agent with a fateful secret embarks on an extraordinary journey of redemption by forever changing the lives of seven strangers.

MY REVIEW


I don't want to lie or be tricky in my review of this film. I simply did not get or really even care for 'Seven Pounds'. This is one of those movies where the critics really hate it but fans really love it. I don't like to call myself a critic, I like to think I'm more open minded of a film reviewer. But I have to say...I agree with the critics on this movie. It is way to grim but not all that emotional. This really is a fake you out tearjerker that doesn't really even make you cry. I didn't cry. I didn't even get teary eyed or choked up. This movie had zero emotional pull. It did not tug on the strings of my heart. It was weak and by the end all I thought was, "Yeah, OK so what?".

This is strange for me to say, but this movie suffered from not revealing to much in the preview. This has to be one of the most mysterious films of the past decade. I don't think anyone knew what on earth it was about going into the movie based of the trailers. Usually that's great, but here it really faltered from poor advertising. Because nothing about the story was shocking and you can almost see the whole thing coming. Everyone keeps saying there's a big "twist" in the end. Where??? You should have expected it to end the way it did from the very first scene. Yes at the beginning you could have logically thought it wouldn't really go that way, but when it does...how can you be shocked? They dropped obvious hints the ENTIRE movie. So I ask again, what was so "twisty" about this ending?? It should have been touching, but instead it was just blah.

The story was WAY to mysterious for WAY to long. I mean it goes well over an hour before you truly learn exactly why this man is doing what he's doing. The previews advertise that he is supposed to do something miraculous for seven strangers. The film only really focuses on one of them and the rest are mere after thoughts. And I'm confused as to how he even helped one or two of them. He's supposed to be this great man doing great things, but you don't really feel that. By the time it's revealed what he's doing, and honestly there really isn't that much explanation, it's really just disappointing. Was it just me, or was everyone able to predict where this movie was going? I thought the end was kind of a cop out actually.

For a movie that was meant to be very emotional, I had no connection with any of the characters. What's with movies these days focusing WAY to much on story and visuals and not on buttering up their characters through the story to get us as an audience to actually care for them? I didn't care about anyone in this movie, at least not really. Like I said I didn't even get teary eyed. This movie just grazed over it's glossy surface and never dug deep into the real spirit and nature of these characters. So why should we care about them?

Maybe I'm being to harsh here. There were some bright spots. It was filmed excellently and had some great musical scoring. Oscar nominee Will Smith (Ali, Pursuit of Happyness) was very good as expected. Yet not as powerful or as moving as he was in Pursuit of Happyness. His performance was a bit dry at times, but for the most part he was awesome. The brightest spot was Rosario Dawson (Rent, Sin City). I thought she was absolutely incredible throughout this film. I was very pleasantly surprised by her, because she's not one you think would deliver a performance of this caliber. It is kind of a shame this movie is the way it is, or else I think Dawson might have garnered some award attention. Everyone else in the movie seemed to be extended cameos. Even Rosario Dawson didn't seem like a leading lady.

I really hate to say I disliked a Will Smith movie, he is one of my very favorite actors working today. I guess even the greats can't be perfect every time right? Oh well, I know he will step it up next time. But today, Smith severely swung and missed on his choice and movies. I really just didn't care for this film. Yikes, maybe I am becoming a snobby critic! That doesn't mean you shouldn't go see this movie, readers. You may very much like it, a lot of regular audiences genuinely like the film. Just wasn't for me personally.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Seven Pounds

*This is the 174th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Special

Special

Rated R

Running time: 1 hr 18 mins

Cast:

Michael Rapaport
Paul Blackthorne
Josh Peck

Critical Consensus:

*** out of *****
(58% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

****1/2 out of *****




The Premise:

A lonely metermaid has a psychotic reaction to his medication and becomes convinced he's a superhero. A very select group of people in life are truly gifted. Special is a movie about everyone else.

MY REVIEW


'Special' is a incredible movie. Would you ever think you would see an independent "superhero" movie? Probably not! Well this movie is half a superhero movie, considering there aren't any characters with actual super powers. The main character in this film, Les, only thinks he has super powers because he's having an adverse reaction to a trial study medication called "Special". We are told everyone else in the study reacted just fine to the drug, but Les is the rare exception. When his doctor and his friends tell him the drug is making him think he's someone 'special' he doesn't believe them and thinks they are the enemy. Les thinks he can fly, teleport, become invisible, etc. When he displays these things to his friends he's just slamming into walls, falling flat on his face, or just running away but he thinks he has great powers.

It may sound like a comedy, and in a way it is but really this film is a very moving drama. It tells a very sad yet oddly inspirational story with a few deep messages. This film shows us what America has become: a pill popping society. We pop pills to make us different then who we truly are. Some of us have meds to make us happy; some to calm us down; some to make us concentrate, the list goes on. Now a lot of us need these pills to function properly. Heck I take a few pills for seizures and bi-polar disorder. But this movie really displays how dependent we can become on these medications in order for us to live lives we can't make for ourselves. The movie hit the point right on the head, and I thought it was perfect!

This also has another side, a more poignant one. Les is a nobody, he has barely any friends. He has job that people hate or make fun of. He has no girlfriend. He lives alone. He gets pushed around. But once he takes these pills, he becomes someone new. He becomes someone that he thinks people will love and aim all their attention towards. He tries to stop crime (really he's just tackling innocent people because he thinks he read their minds and saw their evil thoughts). Even after he's told what the pills have done to him, he doesn't care he keeps taking them. These pills make him believe that people will like him for who he is. The best part of the movie is when he's being beat down and forced to say he's a nobody. A scene later he confronts these men who do this, and doesn't give up on his battle. He's off the pills, but he keeps taking the violence they throw their way. It was a very moving scene because for the first time in his life, he took control. He realized he didn't need a pill to make him a strong willed person. Les is one of my favorite characters of the year. He was very inspirational. The story was just awesome. It was very well written.

The star of the film is Michael Rapaport (Deep Blue Sea, TV's Prison Break). I've never paid much attention to his career and I've seen him pop up in a few films. He's never been a person I thought could carry a film in a lead role. I was wrong. His portrayal of this deeply scarred and troubled individual who just want's to be noticed was brilliant! One of the best male performances of this year, and I know for a fact it has and will go unnoticed. He plays this character almost like a child, and you feel so bad for him. This guy was so consistently good throughout the entirety of the film, and had some amazing stand out scenes that were very heartwarming. It's a shame he won't get a single ounce of award attention. Well...he will from me!

The film also looks really great. Believe it or not there are special effects in this indi-flick. Not amazing ones, but I think that was kind of intended. It was all shot with such a dark quality, and really set the tone for the film. The direction never once let the audience feel truly happy, but at the same time the movie still put a few smiles on my face. I just thought the movie was excellently shot.

You can find 'Special' on your Cox On Demand if of course you have Cox. I would strongly recommend this movie to all my readers. It really is an excellent film that I honestly believe most people could grow to love and enjoy.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Special

*This is the 173rd new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

*This film is currently playing in some independent theaters as well as on Cox On Demand!

Monday, December 22, 2008

Yes Man

Yes Man

Rated PG-13

Running time: 1 hr 43 mins

Cast:

Jim Carrey
Zooey Deschanel
Bradley Cooper

Critical Consensus:

**1/2 out of *****
(43% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

**1/2 out of *****



The Premise:

A guy challenges himself to say "yes" to everything for an entire year.

MY REVIEW


I won't dribble on to much with my review of Yes Man. For me this film was just another forgettable comedy from Jim Carrey (Liar Liar, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind). I've actually grown tired of his comedy routine in his films, and I prefer him in dramas now. He actually has the ability to be a fantastic actor when he's serious such as in films like The Truman Show and Eternal Sunshine. But he just starts to try to hard in his comedies of late. He doesn't do his over the top thing like he usually does, in this film but there are still hints of it. The weird contorted faces, the high pitched voices, it's all so 90's Jim Carrey. If he is going to continue to do comedy, maybe he should switch it up a bit and be original. Or just stick to drama man!

The movie isn't bad though. It does actually have some funny moments, but I didn't laugh out loud in any aspect of the film. I think a lot of the jokes and whatnot were a tad to awkward or outdated or just simply poorly written. But a few good ones slipped through the cracks. The story also has a good message: be more open to things. You know we live in a world full of "No", "Maybe" and "Sure". Everyone knows when a friend or family member tells you "Maybe" to an invite or just to hang out...they clearly mean "No". People are just to full of themselves or have to many unsure plans to commit to anything outside of their routine. People these days just simply assume they have plans every weekend so they can't say "Yes" to someone outside their normal plans just in case something "better" does come up. You know if you don't have definite, set plans, say "Yes" to someone who wants to do something with you. Stop being selfish. You lose people that way, just like Jim Carrey nearly does in this film. It's kind of weird I got a deep meaning out of this film huh? But it's true...open your book a little more, be open to doing things you don't always do. Why do you HAVE to live the same routine with the same group of people every weekend? Or the same routine with yourself every weekend? Or whatever your case may be. I know I'm that way, but this movie actually opened my eyes a little bit. Kind of bizarre I know!!

But yeah, Yes Man worked on some levels, but for the most part fell flat for me. The writing was a little plain and dull and not consistently funny. I'm tired of laughing at people getting hit in the head, or making funny faces. I want more grown up comedies (and not the ones littered with sex jokes and nudity...those also are for adolescents). But the serious or random comedies (like Juno or Burn After Reading) don't really exist these days because audiences don't usually flock to see them. But Yes Man tries, it really does. Unfortunately for me, it just didn't quite get over that bump.

On a side note Zooey Deschanel (The Happening, Almost Famous) really surprised me. She delivered one of the single worst performances in a major released motion picture I've ever seen in The Happening earlier this year. But in Yes Man she was kind of sweet, funny and charming. I liked her here. She should just stick to this type of film. Leave the serious stuff to the professionals.

**HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAY THIS WEEK!!!!*


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Yes Man

*This is the 172nd new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Hamlet 2

Hamlet 2

Rated R

Running time: 1 hr 32 mins

Cast:

Steve Coogan
Catherine Keener
Joseph Julian Sorian
Skyler Astin

Critical Consensus:

*** out of *****
(63% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

** out of *****

The Premise:

In this irreverent comedy, a failed actor-turned-worse-high-school-drama-teacher rallies his Tucson, AZ students as he conceives and stages politically incorrect musical sequel to Shakespeare's Hamlet.

MY REVIEW


If Hamlet 2 was supposed to be a spoof on movies like Dangerous Minds and Dead Poets Society, than it may have worked well. However, if it was supposed to be a random movie with it's own story, than it wasn't that great. The only positive thing I can say about this movie was that it was legitimately funny. I had a fun time watching it, but that's really it. Because if this was supposed to be a film with it's own story and not making fun of other movies, it really was just too silly for my liking. The story was a bit dumb, and the characters were kind of stupid. The acting wasn't bad, the performances were actually quite humorous...but man what idiotic, unappealing characters. No it wasn't offense with all the Jesus references, including a song titled "Rock Me Sexy Jesus". That song was actually kind of funny. But can a movie really just be carried solely on the fact that it's amusing? I don't think so, at least not for me. And that's why Hamlet 2, for me, wasn't all that great or entertaining. Got some good chuckles out of me, but everything else was to overly stupid.



To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Hamlet 2

*This is the 171st new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

*This film is now on DVD.

Burn After Reading

Burn After Reading

Rated R

Running time: 1 hr 36 mins

Cast:

George Clooney
Frances McDormand
John Malkovich
Brad Pitt
Tilda Swinton

Critical Consensus:

***1/2 out of *****
(79% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

**** out of *****


The Premise:

A disk containing the memoirs of a CIA agent ends up in the hands of two unscrupulous gym employees who attempt to sell it.

MY REVIEW


'Burn After Reading' is essentially a film whose story has absolutely no purpose for existing. By the end, it literally goes nowhere and we end basically where we began. The characters aren't anyone that important in the world and all they are is a vehicle to drive this virtually pointless film. 'Burn After Reading' is a great film, and I am not being sarcastic.

Everything I said above is true. This is a movie with no important story, but I think that was the point. It was almost a satirical or spoof film. Basically two characters come across a CD containing the memoirs of an ex-CIA analyst, and they try to blackmail him in order to get a crud load of money. The information on the CD is really nothing top secret, yet these two nobodies think it is. We also have the storyline of said analyst and his life going downhill fast. His wife is sleeping with a married and overly paranoid treasury agent.

This may all sound like it is going somewhere interesting, but it never really does. But the writing of this film is outstanding and by the end I really didn't care that the story went nowhere. The characters, while having no grave importance in the grand scheme of things, are incredibly entertaining. It's a story that you really can never take seriously, and I also think that was the point. You can't take the characters seriously, so why do the same to the story? So what we are left with is a highly engaging and entertaining film. It's not a stupid story, just a pointless one. And personally I thought it worked brilliantly.

This has to be one of the most fun and "intelligent" comedies I've seen this year. The humor is very witty and smart. I don't think a lot of audiences would get the comedy, because today we are used to raunchy sex comedies coming out every two months. It's very refreshing to a have a comedy where the humor is never over the top or to much to handle. It's not just joke after joke, the movie takes breaks. The writing was done so well to bring this comedy to the story, but it was in the characters where all the real fun happened.

This film has an incredible cast. One of the most talented of the year in my opinion. Oscar nominee John Malkovich (In the Line of Fire, Changeling) plays the ex-analyst. He's a bit vulgar, but man was he great! He does an awesome job of really making you hate this character, but at the same time just love to watch him. Oscar winner George Clooney (Syriana, Michael Clayton) is not an actor I love as much as everyone else. He is talented, but I think over rated. However, he was perfect for this role. This had to be my favorite Clooney performance. Really great. Oscar winner Frances McDormand (Fargo, Almost Famous) was amazing! I've always been a big fan! She was so far out of her normal zone I feel like, and it was so good! Funny performance too! I think the highlight of the performances was Oscar nominee Brad Pitt (Twelve Monkeys, Babel). I think all the main actors were out of their element in this film (and in a good way) but Pitt was like I've never seen him before. His character was so stupid and bubbly, that you just love the guy! I cannot believe Pitt is not garnering any attention for this performance, I think it's one of the best supporting roles of the year! Also like to point out that
J.K. Simmons (Juno, Spiderman) has a really funny limited role!

Burn After Reading is just a super fun movie that you don't have to take seriously. At the same time, it's oddly believable. It's on DVD now, if you like a good cast, or a funny story, this is a movie for you! I loved it!


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Burn After Reading

*This is the 170th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

*This film is now on DVD.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

FOREIGN FEATURE: Let the Right One In

Let the Right One In (Låt den Rätte Komma in)

Rated R

Running time: 1 hr 49 mins

Cast:

Kåre Hedebrant
Lina Leanderson

Critical Consensus:

**** out of *****
(97% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

****1/2 out of *****

The Premise:

Oskar, a bullied 12-year old, dreams of revenge. He falls in love with Eli, a peculiar girl. She can't stand the sun or food and to come into a room she needs to be invited. Eli gives Oskar the strength to hit back but when he realizes that Eli needs to drink other peoples blood to live he's faced with a choice. How much can love forgive? Let The Right One In is a story both violent and highly romantic, set in the Stockholm suburb of Blackeberg in 1982.

MY REVIEW


Let the Right One In is what Twilight should have been and I really hate to compare the two, but they share a lot in common. This too is about a "young" vampire who falls for someone even though they lust for their blood. The characters are much younger however, they are only twelve years old. Also the genders are reversed because the girl is the vampire and the boy is the one who falls in love. Yes kids can fall in love with each other. Maybe not in a sense that adults do, but kids can still feel love and companionship.

It really is a excellent and "sweet" story between these two characters actually. The boy is a loner and is picked on every day. He never defends himself and he's always getting hurt. Then this mysterious girl shows up and quickly a bond develops. The girl we come to find out has been twelve "for a very long time". She's a vampire and has to feed off blood to survive. We have a side story of her killing people for blood which sparks a murder spree that no one can solve. I liked the fact that we got to see the true vampire side to this girl, like we didn't get to see in Twilight. There were no cheesy special effects, which I thought was great. But that is a mere side story. Like I said, the main plot is the relationship of these two polar opposites. And what a magnificent story it was. The innocence of children is a beautiful thing but can also be quite scary and we get a wonderful picture of both sides in this film. It was an incredibly told tale of love.

The direction was fantastic as well. The camera work and musical score really set a very dark tone for the film. This was a much needed improvement over a film like Twilight. The movie and it's snowy and dimly lit backdrops were absolutely perfect. As an audience you never feel safe while watching this movie, even though you have an overwhelming sweetness to the actual story. Also I'd like to point out the two kids did a wonderful job at carrying this movie. It's a foreign movie and all subtitled but that didn't stop me from feeling connected to these two kids. Fantastic job to both of them.

Let the Right One In is definitely not a film for all, but I highly recommend it. It is one of the best films to come out in 2008.


To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Let the Right One In

*This is the 169th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Milk

Milk

Rated R

Running time: 2 hrs 8 mins

Cast:

Sean Penn
Emile Hirsch
Josh Brolin
James Franco

Critical Consensus:

**** out of *****
(92% Fresh Rating!)

Mikey @ The Movies Official Rating:

** out of *****

The Premise:

The story of California's first openly gay elected official, Harvey Milk, a San Francisco supervisor who was assassinated along with Mayor George Moscone by San Francisco Supervisor Dan White.

MY REVIEW


Milk is a film that should have been very important to me, and should have last a lasting impact. It really did not do any of those things. After watching the movie, I'm actually a bit surprised by the huge critical support it is getting right now and all the award attention it has. I'm not saying Milk is a bad film, it's actually pretty good. But it just didn't feel important, and it times like these, this movie should have been huge. For me, Milk is like last year's American Gangster (Ha Ha I know they are polar opposites on storylines). Meaning that it was very good on first time viewing but an hour after watching it...it's simply forgettable. That's really disappointing to me.

The movie tells the true story about Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man elected to a political office in the United States. We are shown the major struggles the gay community faces especially a proposition to take almost every human right away from gays like being able to work anywhere. People were being fired from their jobs for being gay, and people were being fired for just associating with gays. This was all so frustrating to watch, because I just can't stand people creating battles they have no reason to start. Someone being gay has no affect on anyone outside of that person. If you can waste your time and effort on banning rights from gays, then how much of a life are you living for yourself? I could understand if gays were killing people and molesting kids, but my gosh they aren't. They are literally doing NO harm to you...so why fight? Anti-Gay people are just like racists. They are judgmental and ignorant. Spending ALL of your time and even your money to strip rights away from gays when they have done NOTHING to hurt you in any way is pure and utter hatred. Sorry folks, it's true. If you can deny that, than there is something wrong with you. But if you can possibly explain to me the love and support in these things...please tell me...I'm all ears. You know I respect people who just simply don't agree with the lifestyle for their own reasons. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, of course! I'm more irritated by people and groups physically taking severe action against gays in the way they did in the 70's and now again today. It's sickening. It hurts. Being openly judgmental towards a person is actually a lot more hurtful that most people can every really imagine. It actually hurts more than physical pain.

Yikes, I'm ranting! It almost seems like I'm supporting this film now. I guess that makes me a hypocrite for not loving this movie then right? Well no. Listen the story was great, it really was. But sometimes I think a historically based filmed could actually benefit from a little bit of "Hollywood" as they say. The story was told kind of blandly and moved very slow. It was never fully able to grab a hold of me and reel me in like I was expecting it to do. There was never that emotional and powerful moment. So I think it could have benefited for some Hollywood-ized puffing up of emotions. You know you are supposed to really root for Harvey Milk, but he's kind of portrayed dully. Not to knock Oscar winner Sean Penn (Mystic River, I Am Sam) because he did a great job at performing the character, but he was written so uninspiring and I really hate to say that. Harvey Milk really did change a whole lot of things, but this movie I don't think did him full justice.

Actually there aren't any characters you fully connect with, well at least that I didn't connect with. None of them had that great likability factor because we knew virtually nothing about any of them. Harvey Milk was assassinated, and I'm not ruining a major plot point. You are told this fact in the very beginning of the film. The way the film portrays it, Milk is actually not killed for being gay, he's killed by a man who just fell off the deep end and went a little nuts. But this movie did allow us to invest in these characters, it did not develop a real connection. So when the scene comes where he is killed, it just kind of feels empty. I didn't feel sad (I obviously I'm saddened for the real Harvey Milk) because the movies story didn't really make me care. I don't know it's hard to explain. Because this is a good one time movie.

I'd like to quickly point out Josh Brolin (No Country for Old Men, American Gangster) and how great I thought he was. This guy has really developed into a fantastic actor. He plays Dan White, the man who kills Harvey Milk. The funny thing is, the only character I felt any connection to and felt bad for was this man and he was the "bad" guy. So I just wanted to applaud Brolin for doing a fantastic job, and I really think he deserves a supporting actor Oscar nomination. James Franco (Spiderman craze)also surprised me and we wasn't bad himself.

So for me, Milk was a good movie but in the end let me down. It has a great story and message to tell it just wasn't told with any real emotional oomph. Oh well, can't win them all.

To view this film's theatrical trailer, click this link: Milk

*This is the 168th new film I've seen and reviewed this year.